Skip to product information
1 of 11
Regular price $29.99 USD
Regular price Sale price $29.99 USD
Sale Sold out
Taxes included. Shipping calculated at checkout. Free US shipping on everything; free international shipping on tees, sticker sheets & 4+ stickers.
Color
Black
Size
S–5XL
Made
To order · shipping times
Color
Size

Details

Size & fitS–5XL

Unisex heavy cotton (Gildan 5000), classic fit.

Unisex tee size chart, inches
SizeWidthLengthSleeve
S182815.1
M202916.5
L223018
XL243119.5
2XL263221
3XL283322.4
4XL303423.7
5XL323525

Measurements in inches, ±1.5 in tolerance.

ShippingFree

Free shipping on every order with a tee, in the US and in every country we ship to. Printed to order for you.

Delivery times & where we ship

The physics

Reflexia's halves never message each other. Their answers line up anyway, beyond what any messageless plan allows.

Send two particles in the singlet state far apart. At each end an experimenter picks one of two measurement settings and records +1 or −1. Repeat, computing the correlation E for each setting pair. The first formula on this page combines four of those correlations into one number, S.

In 1964 John Bell showed that if each particle carries its own instructions from the start, and nothing done at one end can affect the other, the correlations are limited. The version here is the 1969 form by Clauser, Horne, Shimony and Holt, made for real experiments: S can be at most 2 in size. Quantum mechanics predicts E equal to minus the cosine of the angle between the settings, the third formula. Choose 0° and 90° at one end, 45° and 135° at the other, and the size of S comes out 2√2, about 2.83. Boris Tsirelson proved in 1980 that 2√2 is the most quantum mechanics can ever give.

Experiments side with quantum theory: Freedman and Clauser in 1972; Alain Aspect's group in 1982, switching settings while the photons were in flight; and in 2015 Bas Hensen and colleagues at Delft, with electron spins 1.3 kilometres apart, closing the main loopholes in a single experiment. Aspect, Clauser and Anton Zeilinger shared the 2022 Nobel Prize.

None of this lets anyone send a signal. Each side alone sees random +1s and −1s, whatever the other does. The correlation shows up only when the two records are brought together by ordinary means, no faster than light. Whether something nonlocal links the pair, or another assumption fails, depends on interpretation and is still argued.

Reflexia's halves never talk. They just never disagree like strangers.

Equations

\[S = E(a,b) - E(a,b^{\prime}) + E(a^{\prime},b) + E(a^{\prime},b^{\prime})\]
\[\lvert S\rvert \le 2 \ (\text{local}), \qquad \lvert S\rvert \le 2\sqrt{2} \ (\text{quantum})\]
\[E(a,b) = -\cos(\theta_a - \theta_b) \ (\text{singlet})\]
Symbols
SymbolMeaningUnit
\(S\) CHSH combination \(\mathrm{1}\)
\(E(a,b)\) correlation of ±1 outcomes for settings a, b \(\mathrm{1}\)
\(\theta_a, \theta_b\) analyser angles \(\mathrm{rad}\)
View full details