• Pixel-art Chivelle, the Too-Good-Fit Inquisitor, on a black mug with the slogan "CHI²/NDF = 0.2. REVIEWER 2 IS SUSPICIOUS."

IndexCatalogueMug

Chivelle, the Too-Good-Fit Inquisitor Mug

\[\frac{\chi^{2}}{\nu} \approx 1\]
Prezzo di listino $21.99 USD
Prezzo di listino Prezzo scontato $21.99 USD
In offerta Esaurito
Size

χ² per degree of freedom near 1 indicates a good fit; much less than 1 means the error bars were overestimated.

The joke: A fit that is too good is suspicious, which only fitters know. The slogan on the mug reads CHI²/NDF = 0.2. REVIEWER 2 IS SUSPICIOUS.

Source: Particle Data Group, 'Statistics' review (2022), goodness-of-fit section.

Shipping calculated at checkout by destinationMade to order, ships in ~10 days

Details

Size & material11oz · 15oz

Black glossy ceramic mug with a C-handle. Lead- and BPA-free.

  • 11oz: 0.33 l
  • 15oz: 0.44 l
CareDishwasher & microwave safe

Dishwasher safe (top rack) or hand wash. Microwave safe.

ShippingBy destination

Shipping calculated at checkout by destination.

Made to order: about 10 days of production and handling before it ships.

Delivery times & where we ship

Returns & replacements21 days

Every item is printed to order, so we can’t accept returns or exchanges for change of mind, or if you ordered the wrong size or colour.

Print defect, misprint, damage or the wrong item? We’ll send a free replacement, or a refund if you prefer. Report it within 21 days of delivery with a photo; no need to send it back.

Full refund & replacement policy

The physics

χ² per degree of freedom near 1 indicates a good fit; much less than 1 means the error bars were overestimated.

The joke: A fit that is too good is suspicious, which only fitters know. The slogan on the mug reads CHI²/NDF = 0.2. REVIEWER 2 IS SUSPICIOUS.

Source: Particle Data Group, 'Statistics' review (2022), goodness-of-fit section.

Equations

\[\frac{\chi^{2}}{\nu} \approx 1\]
Symbols
SymbolMeaningUnit
\(\chi^{2}\) chi-squared of the fit —
\(\nu\) number of degrees of freedom —

Sources

  1. Particle Data Group, 'Statistics' review (2022), goodness-of-fit section