IndexQuantenTee

Reflexia

The Nonlocal Mirror / Quantum Nonlocality Physics

\[S = E(a,b) - E(a,b^{\prime}) + E(a^{\prime},b) + E(a^{\prime},b^{\prime})\]
Normaler Preis $29.99 USD
Normaler Preis Verkaufspreis $29.99 USD
Sale Ausverkauft
Color
Size

Size guide S–5XL · inches

Two particles, far apart, keep answering in step, and no message passes between them. Bell tests show entangled particles share correlations no local theory explains, yet no signal passes. Reflexia wears it in pixel art on a unisex tee. The physics panel below has the equation, every symbol and the sources.

Shipping calculated at checkout by destinationMade to order, ships in 2–5 business days

Details

Size & fitS–5XL

Unisex heavy cotton (Gildan 5000), classic fit.

Unisex tee size chart, inches
SizeWidthLengthSleeve
S182815.1
M202916.5
L223018
XL243119.5
2XL263221
3XL283322.4
4XL303423.7
5XL323525

Zum Größenvergleich: Größe M ist 20 in (50.80 cm) breit, etwa 3.143 × 1034 Planck-Längen (lP = 1.616255 × 10−35 m). Ein Maßband geht schneller.

Measurements in inches, ±1.5 in tolerance.

ShippingBy destination

Shipping calculated at checkout by destination. Printed to order for you.

Delivery times & where we ship

Returns & replacements21 days

Every item is printed to order, so we can’t accept returns or exchanges for change of mind, or if you ordered the wrong size or colour.

Print defect, misprint, damage or the wrong item? We’ll send a free replacement, or a refund if you prefer. Report it within 21 days of delivery with a photo; no need to send it back.

Full refund & replacement policy

The physics

The CHSH combination S adds up correlations measured with two settings on each side. Any local theory with pre-set answers keeps |S| at 2 or less, while quantum mechanics allows up to 2√2, and experiments find the quantum value.

Reflexia's halves never message each other. Their answers line up anyway, beyond what any messageless plan allows.

Send two particles in the singlet state far apart. At each end an experimenter picks one of two measurement settings and records +1 or −1. Repeat, computing the correlation E for each setting pair. The first formula on this page combines four of those correlations into one number, S.

In 1964 John Bell showed that if each particle carries its own instructions from the start, and nothing done at one end can affect the other, the correlations are limited. The version here is the 1969 form by Clauser, Horne, Shimony and Holt, made for real experiments: S can be at most 2 in size. Quantum mechanics predicts E equal to minus the cosine of the angle between the settings, the third formula. Choose 0° and 90° at one end, 45° and 135° at the other, and the size of S comes out 2√2, about 2.83. Boris Tsirelson proved in 1980 that 2√2 is the most quantum mechanics can ever give.

Experiments side with quantum theory: Freedman and Clauser in 1972; Alain Aspect's group in 1982, switching settings while the photons were in flight; and in 2015 Bas Hensen and colleagues at Delft, with electron spins 1.3 kilometres apart, closing the main loopholes in a single experiment. Aspect, Clauser and Anton Zeilinger shared the 2022 Nobel Prize.

None of this lets anyone send a signal. Each side alone sees random +1s and −1s, whatever the other does. The correlation shows up only when the two records are brought together by ordinary means, no faster than light. Whether something nonlocal links the pair, or another assumption fails, depends on interpretation and is still argued.

Reflexia's halves never talk. They just never disagree like strangers.

Equations

\[S = E(a,b) - E(a,b^{\prime}) + E(a^{\prime},b) + E(a^{\prime},b^{\prime})\]
\[\lvert S\rvert \le 2 \ (\text{local}), \qquad \lvert S\rvert \le 2\sqrt{2} \ (\text{quantum})\]
\[E(a,b) = -\cos(\theta_a - \theta_b) \ (\text{singlet})\]
Symbols
SymbolMeaningUnit
\(S\) CHSH combination \(\mathrm{1}\)
\(E(a,b)\) correlation of ±1 outcomes for settings a, b \(\mathrm{1}\)
\(\theta_a, \theta_b\) analyser angles \(\mathrm{rad}\)

Source Clauser, J. F.; Horne, M. A.; Shimony, A.; Holt, R. A. (1969). Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. Physical Review Letters 23, 880–884.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880 (opens in a new tab)

Passt gut zu